Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 10^120 is the answer regis!

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:25:18 12/23/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 23, 2000 at 09:01:29, Joshua Lee wrote:

>this is over a google and even if your program could search at 5 trillion nodes
>per second it wouldn't solve chess in your lifetime.
>
> 64^64 is one number that comes to mind  3.9402006196394479212279040100144e+115

The number of leagl positions is clearly smaller than 64^64.

I do not understand why do you think about 64^64.

Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.