Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150)

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 20:28:38 01/24/98

Go up one level in this thread

On January 24, 1998 at 23:08:46, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>Yes, I *do* have a copy of the book, and what I *HATE* about this ECM
>file is that the positions are all numbered incorrectly!  Since everyone
>is cleaning this up it would be nice to have the position numbers
>actually be the same as what the book uses.  If I were to go through the
>agony of finding out the numbers for each after you guys cut down the
>number of problems in the set would people actually use the correct
>numbers?
>
>Dave Gomboc
>gomboc@cpsc.ucalgary.ca

Augh.. can anyone confirm that all I need to do to look these up
correctly in my book is to add 938 to each of the problem numbers?

Dave Gomboc
gomboc@cpsc.ucalgary.ca

• Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150) Howard Exner 21:09:04 01/24/98
• Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150) Bruce Moreland 20:43:57 01/24/98
  • Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150) Howard Exner 21:16:27 01/24/98
    • Tactical Problem Sets (was Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150)) Dave Gomboc 10:39:29 01/25/98
      • Re: Tactical Problem Sets (was Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150)) Willie Wood 21:44:07 01/25/98
        • Re: Tactical Problem Sets (was Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150)) Dave Gomboc 22:39:17 01/25/98
          • Re: Tactical Problem Sets (was Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150)) Ed Schröder 07:53:32 01/26/98

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.