Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ECM errata (101 thru 150)

Author: Howard Exner

Date: 21:09:04 01/24/98

Go up one level in this thread


On January 24, 1998 at 23:28:38, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>
>On January 24, 1998 at 23:08:46, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>Yes, I *do* have a copy of the book, and what I *HATE* about this ECM
>>file is that the positions are all numbered incorrectly!  Since everyone
>>is cleaning this up it would be nice to have the position numbers
>>actually be the same as what the book uses.  If I were to go through the
>>agony of finding out the numbers for each after you guys cut down the
>>number of problems in the set would people actually use the correct
>>numbers?
>>
>>Dave Gomboc
>>gomboc@cpsc.ucalgary.ca
>
>Augh.. can anyone confirm that all I need to do to look these up
>correctly in my book is to add 938 to each of the problem numbers?

Yes that's what I've been doing. As you have discovered the positions
are
taken from the second half of the book.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.