Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:25:19 12/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 24, 2000 at 15:11:45, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On December 24, 2000 at 03:02:26, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 23, 2000 at 20:31:04, Joshua Lee wrote: >> >>>So far Fritz solves Position 2 but gandalf now at 1:11:35 doesn't why it is >>>saying depth of 6 is beyond me. i will re-run this >> >>Gandalf has no chance to solve position number 2. >> >>This position is not for it and I am almost sure (based on analysis with it) >>that Gandalf is not going to solve it in 24 hours on your hardware. >> >>I did not give Gandalf 24 hours but I pushed the position forward and I found >>that Gandalf cannot see the problem in some hours even some plies after the >>initial position. >> >>Uri > >Position 2 is easier than position 1, in my experience. It depends on the program. For Gandalf position number 1 is easier. It can see a positive score and not only the right main line in a few hours for position number 1 when it cannot see a positive score in some hours even 2 or 3 plies after Rxc5(It means that it probably has no chance to find Rxc5 because it has no reason to change its mind from another drawing move Bf6). Uri
This page took 0.22 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.