Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "Statistically insignificant" Anand win against Kramnik

Author: Charles Milton Ling

Date: 15:16:58 12/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 26, 2000 at 16:47:12, James Robertson wrote:

>On December 26, 2000 at 11:04:04, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On December 25, 2000 at 17:22:32, Charles Milton Ling wrote:
>>
>>>On December 25, 2000 at 12:29:17, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 25, 2000 at 12:15:27, Charles Milton Ling wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I am not arguing about the confidence level.
>>>>>I would only like to state that Anand is really to be pitied if winning three
>>>>>games and drawing one is ascribed to mere good fortune.
>>>>>
>>>>>Charley
>>>>
>>>>Remember you first have to qualify to play at the final by eliminating a bunch
>>>>of other good players. Therefore, by just qualifying to play at the final it was
>>>>a very tidious task which required much more than simply winning convincibly
>>>>3.5 games he also was the only players not to lose a single game period. Sorry
>>>>your comment is reflecting the same attitude of all Shirov's fans.
>>>>
>>>>PS: Can you simply accept the fact that he was the best player overall, not only
>>>>for winning this Knockout FIDE match, but the best player period.
>>>>
>>>>Pichard.
>>>
>>>Please...
>>>Read what I said again more carefully.  I was *emphasizing* that if you expect
>>>more of Anand than the result he achieved, you are demanding the absurd.
>>>Incidentally, as far as any "fandom" of mine goes, it extends equally to both of
>>>these great players.
>>>"Best player period"?  Debatable.  But I won't argue.  (I think there is *no*
>>>"best player period" at the moment.)
>>>Charley
>>
>>Probably this article base on these probabilities will convince you; As you can
>>tell all the experts agreed that Anand was the best form the start:
>>
>>http://www.kasparov.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=13880&p_docLang=EN
>>
>>Pichard.
>
>Nobody said he is obviously better than Kramnik and Kasparov, both of whom beat
>him recently and have higher ratings....
>
>James

Thank you, James.  I was beginning to think I had lost my mind.

Charley



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.