Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 08:28:54 12/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2000 at 11:11:37, Leo Dijksman wrote: >On December 27, 2000 at 10:34:07, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On December 27, 2000 at 09:35:52, Leo Dijksman wrote: >> >>>On December 26, 2000 at 18:06:02, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>> >>>>On December 26, 2000 at 16:53:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 26, 2000 at 12:09:33, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>new in my CCE tourney are ... >>>>>> >>>>>>01. CB The Crazy Bishop 0046 (super results in the first 2 rounds). >>>>>>02. CB Nimzo 8.0 (little problems in the first 2 rounds). >>>>>> 4.0 : 4.0 against Crafty 17.14 >>>>>> 5.0 : 3.0 against Comet B.27 >>>>>>03. CB Deep Fritz T29c >>>>>> At the moment against Fritz 6a (standing so far 1:0 for Fritz 6a, next >>>>>> games over night) ! >>>>>>04. WB LambChop 10.5 >>>>>> 4.0 : 4.0 against the very strong Amy 0.7 ! >>>>>>05. WB Insomniac 0.69a >>>>>> 6.5 : 1.5 against AnMon 5.09 ! >>>>>> >>>>>>I think Insomniac is the strongest amateur program but we will see. I believe >>>>>>Insomniac plays around ~ 2525 ELO and is stronger than Goliath, SOS and Crafty. >>>>>>I think Nimzo Level ! >>>>>> >>>>>>More information under: >>>>>>http://amateurschach.in-trier.de/schach/cbase/cce_main.htm >>>>>> >>>>>>Best >>>>>>Frank >>>>> >>>>>Why don't you have another Tournament Section C where Gandalf 4.32 G play >>>>>against all others programs, I notice that you did not include Gandalf 4.32 Vs >>>>>Deep Fritz or Nimzo 8. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard. >>>> >>>>I play with Chess-Base native engines in tourney "A" and with WinBoard Engines >>>>in tourney "B". I will not make changes in the organisation. Furthermore, it is >>>>to many work to play with WB engines in tourney "A" ! I mean my tournament >>>>running around one year and this is enough ! >>>> >>>>Best >>>>Frank >>> >>>Do this mean that you on top of the page shows the ratings of Frits, Gandalf and >>>Junior while Gandalf has never played against the other top programs?? >>> >>>Best wishes, Leo. >> >>I mean that why I know a lot of results against other top programs. You can >>search more information in the CCE beta test forum or in my News Ticker. >> >>CCE Beta Test forum: >>http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/ >> >>News Ticker: >>http://amateurschach.in-trier.de/news.htm >> >>(here a lot of informations in older News Ticker pages). >> >>News Ticker Overview under: >>http://amateurschach.in-trier.de/news_top.htm >> >>Best >>Frank > >Hi Frank, > i mean that the rating that appears on top of the page are from 2 different >tournaments (CCE-A and CCE-B), so it looks like Gandalf is the nr.2 but actually >it has not played any game against the other top programs that counts for that >ratinglist, or do i see it totally wrong? >I do not mean that Gandalf is not strong or so (i have Gandalf myself and it is >strong!), only i think its not fair to mix up 2 different ratinglists thisway >(but thats my opinion offcourse). >Sorry for my bad english, Leo. Hi, oh I understand you ! Yes a little problem. But in tourney A and B plays 5 same progams in WB version and CB version. I think end of the tourney is the rating list to 90% perfect. When I understand the calculations system right is the good enough when each program plays against each programs. Good enough when I have 5 same programs in tourney a and b. When I added games between Gandalf against Junior, Hiarcs and Fritz in my rating list (I make the experiment last week) I have the same ELOs. So I think the list is now good but at the moment I have not enough games for all programs which started in my tourney. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.