Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 15:38:54 12/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 18:30:18, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 28, 2000 at 18:03:32, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>I suggest you check with both Christophe and the SSDF before posting more of >>your usual anti-SSDF crap. Then you may find out why Gambit Tiger wasn't tested. >> >>Enrique > >look. its easy enrique. > >each time the ssdf comes out, especially at christmas time, >they do not ! (in words: NOT) present the strongest program >when this is a non chessbase-program. > >they have all kind of reasons, excuses. >and they promise that MAYBE the next list... > >this pattern is each year. > >it would be a surprise if this would NOT be the case one day. >but - it never happens. > >you call it crap. >i call it pre-selection of data to tune statistics. > >in almost any scientific field you have those kind of "fine-tuning". >it was invented to keep power in place and shape. >the ones who need the "right" statistics fine-tune the data, >to proof what they KNOW before they count together. I don't know if laughing or crying. Christophe asked the SSDF to wait for the update of Tiger, that's all. Will you drop your conspiracy theories, Thorsten. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.