Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 15:46:47 12/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 18:30:18, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 28, 2000 at 18:03:32, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>I suggest you check with both Christophe and the SSDF before posting more of >>your usual anti-SSDF crap. Then you may find out why Gambit Tiger wasn't tested. >> >>Enrique > >look. its easy enrique. > >each time the ssdf comes out, especially at christmas time, >they do not ! (in words: NOT) present the strongest program >when this is a non chessbase-program. > >they have all kind of reasons, excuses. >and they promise that MAYBE the next list... > >this pattern is each year. > >it would be a surprise if this would NOT be the case one day. >but - it never happens. > >you call it crap. >i call it pre-selection of data to tune statistics. What statistics do they want to tune? > >in almost any scientific field you have those kind of "fine-tuning". >it was invented to keep power in place and shape. Oh its the almighty SSDF power statistics linked to the evil Chessbase empire you fight!! I'm filled with admiration that you stand up against this two mighty evil empires at once! MS looks like mice compared to this! ( Not that I belive MS to be that evil.....) Torstein >the ones who need the "right" statistics fine-tune the data, >to proof what they KNOW before they count together.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.