Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 15:58:45 12/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 18:46:47, Torstein Hall wrote: >Oh its the almighty SSDF power statistics linked to the evil Chessbase empire >you fight!! >I'm filled with admiration that you stand up against this two mighty evil >empires at once! MS looks like mice compared to this! ( Not that I belive MS to >be that evil.....) > >Torstein as long as you made a list, and do not test chessmaster, because you are to lazy, and not tiger because you wait for a patch, you can say whatever you want. why do you do your list when you manipulate it by deciding which one when to test ? it reminds me on the americans and their election. they also decided which votes count and which not. count all. or count none. if you do it with one program this way, and with another program that way, and a third program that is also very strong gets not tested only because the company forgot an autoplayer or the ssdf are not capable to let it autoplay, you are not serious. not scientific. and you can spare your "this program lost 6 points" comments. because you cannot measure 6 points with your methods. you cannot measure 50 points with your methods. all you measure is how unprecise you are. and how good you are in tuning data .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.