Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:02:56 12/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 18:54:51, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >Catch 22. If they test Tiger, they do it against the will of the programmer. If >they do as the programmer asks, they are inconsistent, not "scientific" and "a >joke". No way out. > >Unbiased, "scientific", great thinking. > >Enrique its indeed catch 22. if they test gandalf 500 games with broken learning, and do not patch it, although the patch is one the market for a while, but they follow the wish of the programmer to not test tiger, until the patch is there, they do not test playing strength. they measure their own influence on the data. the observer manipulates the results. there is no objective: program X lost 6 points. THEY made the changes. themselves. by deciding. schrödingers cat. of course this is catch 22. a joke list.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.