Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 16:22:40 12/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 14:41:54, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>R7/8/6k1/4n3/7p/5P2/5r1p/7K b - -
>> 205922704 1351.9 Mat30 16t 1...Kf5 2.Ra4 Rxf3 3.Kxh2 Ng4+ 4.Kg2 Rf2+ 5.Kg1
>> h3 6.Rxg4 h2+ 7.Kxf2 {EGTB} 7...h1=Q! 8.Rd4!
>> Ke5! 9.Rd3! Qc1 10.Ke2! Ke4! 11.Rg3! Qc2+!
>> 12.Ke1! Qc5! 13.Ke2! Qh5+! 14.Kf2! Qh2+! 15.Rg2!
>> Qf4+! 16.Kg1! Ke3! 17.Rb2! Qe4 18.Rb3+! Ke2!
>> 19.Rg3! Qd5! 20.Rg6! Qd4+! 21.Kh2! Qf4+! 22.Kg1!
>> Kf3! 23.Rg2! Qh4! 24.Rg8! Qd4+ 25.Kh2! Qe5+!
>> 26.Kh1 Qa1+! 27.Kh2! Qa2+! 28.Kg1! Qxg8+!
>> 29.Kf1! Qg5 30.Ke1 Qc1#! {1001}
>Which tablebases did you use?
>It seems that you used only the 4 piece tablebases because the EGTB is only in
>position with 4 pieces.
Correct. I have all 4-men TBs installed. Also a very few 5-men, but I think
nothing relevant to this position.
>I guess that with the KRP vs KR tablebases you could find the mate faster.
I think, you are correct, but I cannot test right now, because I do not have the
disk space right now.
-- Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.