Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 16:24:14 12/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 18:58:45, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 28, 2000 at 18:46:47, Torstein Hall wrote: >>Oh its the almighty SSDF power statistics linked to the evil Chessbase empire >>you fight!! >>I'm filled with admiration that you stand up against this two mighty evil >>empires at once! MS looks like mice compared to this! ( Not that I belive MS to >>be that evil.....) >> >>Torstein > >as long as you made a list, and do not test chessmaster, because >you are to lazy, and not tiger because you wait for a patch, >you can say whatever you want. > >why do you do your list when you manipulate it by deciding which one >when to test ? >it reminds me on the americans and their election. they also >decided which votes count and which not. > >count all. or count none. >if you do it with one program this way, and with another program >that way, and a third program that is also very strong gets >not tested only because the company forgot an autoplayer >or the ssdf are not capable to let it autoplay, you >are not serious. not scientific. and you can spare your >"this program lost 6 points" comments. > >because you cannot measure 6 points with your methods. >you cannot measure 50 points with your methods. >all you measure is how unprecise you are. >and how good you are in tuning data . Hi! And there you are again! The reason that we waited for Christophes patch is that I (we) found him to be a very serious and reasonable person and we trusted his intensions to make this patch available soon and FREE for every buyer of his program. I am very sorry for this and believe the original version could have fought for the first place, I think you should see it as his choice and not ours. In the meantime the believers in God or Thorsten Szub can believe in his results. As you already know but suddennly forgot is that we very early received an update to Gandalf4.32.f that fixed the learning-problem. Where are your results from Century3 and CM8000? Everyone that have played with Century3 (except for the IM-revue) knows that Century plays even to almost all programs before the endgame. In the endgame it drops a lot of halfpoints, in example it dropped 5-6 halfpoints against N7.32. Nimzo won 21-19. Why haven't you told Ed or the Forum that? Bad news is news also?! I have told him about C3s problems and the only reason is that I think with a better endagame he can compete with everyone he wants. Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.