Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:27:52 12/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 28, 2000 at 20:56:11, Christophe Theron wrote: >No, you are wrong. And you should definitely have asked me before. why ? your program IS on the market. it should be tested. no matter what you want. >I have asked the SSDF to delay the test of Tiger 13 because I want first to fix >a problem in the program: Tiger too easily lets the opponent replay the same >lost game. other programs had the same "problem". did the ssdf stopped the testing of those programs ? NO. >It happened last year when Tiger 12 lost 12 times the same opening against >Junior6. > >The book learning algorithm hasn't been totally fixed and I do not want the same >problem to happen again. This problem will probably never hurt the people who >have bought the program, because most of the users do not play long series of >autoplayed matches. But it is definitely going to show up in the (long) SSDF >matches. > >So I have asked Thoralf to delay the test, for this reason, and he kindly >accepted. > >The SSDF is in my opinion totally independant of any software company. thats YOUR opinion. in fact they never where. >And one thing you should remember: last year, just before Christmas, Tiger 12 >topped the SSDF list for the first time. One month before Christmas. So you >could as well forget your theory about a Christmas ChessBase/SSDF conspiracy. :-))) this year chessbase has no product :-)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.