Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:45:47 12/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2000 at 05:01:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 28, 2000 at 20:40:24, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>No Thorsten. It's because I have personally asked the SSDF to delay the test of >>Tiger a little bit, until the next free update is released. >> >>The SSDF has kindly accepted. > >nice. i would like them to ACT the same procedure for ALL programs. I think that they have the same procedure for all programs. I do not know about a programmer who asked them to wait few monthes before testing his program when they replied: "No,we are going to test it now and we are not going to wait few monthes." >otherwise programmers can manipulate the list. >if they e.g. continue to test a version with broken learning, >although their is a patch, they influence the ratings. They did not continue to test a version with broken learning although there is a patch. When there was a patch they used the patch and only part of the games of Gandalf4.32f is with broken learning and not the new games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.