Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:18:13 12/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2000 at 08:58:38, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>The goal of this post is not to frown on hard work from any and all testers, >>it is certainly well appreciated,and needed. >>I was hoping there would be at least ONE list that was ALL INCLUSIVE. >>I am apparently dreaming, you have PINCHED ME to the possible impracticality >>of this wonderful goal. >>Additionally, I have no plans to start a testing organization of any kind, >>I thought the existing ones with their experience and knowledge could make an >>all inclusive list at least of the top contenders. Winboards generally don't >>fit in this category except maybe Gandalf. >>Regards, >>Paul > >you can easily let winboard programs or chessmaster autoplay against any >other program automatically. > >these programs/devices are all available in the net. many of them >have even been named here or people posted about in this forum. > >i don't understand why they don't register and do not test CM8. >Or why they test gandalf in fritz user interface. i think gandalf is stronger >in winboard interface. I am curious as to why it would be stronger in one interface over another. Is the Fritz interface sending some kind of reset to eliminate ponder?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.