Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 17:01:37 12/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2000 at 15:47:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2000 at 14:12:49, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 29, 2000 at 13:00:13, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>[D]r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Mine finds e5 in 66 hours on a quad Xeon, with a score that fails high and >>>resolves after 93 hours to +5, in ply 17. >> >>What is the score and the move of it before finding e5? It thinks Nce2 is +2. I don't see any material win in the line, just a systematic shattering of black's position. It thinks ... g5 is a forced response. >Another question is what is the main line of your program after these 93 hours. > >I read the main line 1.e5 dxe5 2.Ne4 Nh5 3.Qg6 in a previous post about the >nolot positions. e5 Nh5 Qg6 d5 Qxh5 That's just a straight give of a piece. This is probably horizon rather than a best defense, but it's obvious it found something nasty after the line given. bruce >Is your main line beginning with these moves? > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.