Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 17:03:33 12/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2000 at 14:27:40, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Bruce, > >This is what I get with Gambit Tiger 1.0 on a PII 333 with 96 Mb RAM and 48 Mb >hash tables. Notice the e5 choice at 10 and 11 ply. > >00:00:00.8 2.60 6 31545 Nf3 Qe7 e5 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 exd6 Qxd6 >00:00:01.6 2.60 7 70319 Nf3 Qe7 e5 Nd5 Nxd5 exd5 exd6 Qxd6 Nd4 >00:00:05.7 2.78 8 411894 Nf3 Ng8 e5 d5 Qg6 Rc8 Ba4 Ne7 >00:00:08.9 2.92 8 608074 Qg6 Qe7 e5 dxe5 Nf3 Rec8 Nxe5 Be8 >00:00:10.6 2.52 9 797425 Qg6 Qe7 e5 dxe5 Nf3 Qd6 Rd1 Qc7 Rde1 >00:00:22.7 2.62 9 1678251 Nde2 Qe7 Nf4 Qf7 e5 dxe5 Ng6+ Kg8 Nxe5 Bc6 >00:00:25.0 2.62 10 1902936 Nde2 Qe7 Nf4 Qf7 e5 dxe5 Ng6+ Kg8 Nxe5 Bc6 Qg3 >00:00:39.6 2.70 10 2886962 e5 dxe5 Ne4 Nh5 Qg4 Nf4 Nd6 Qf6 Nxe8 Rxe8 Nf3 >00:00:50.4 2.40 11 3790039 e5 dxe5 Ne4 Nh5 Qg4 Nf4 Nd6 Qf6 Nxe8 Rxe8 Nf3 Bc5 >00:01:04.7 2.80 11 4827181 Nde2 Qe7 Nf4 Qf7 e5 dxe5 Ng6+ Kg8 Nxe5 Bc6 Bd5 Bxd5 >Nxd5 >00:01:47.8 2.96 11 8042077 Nf3 Ng8 Qh3 Be7 Bxe6 Bxe6 Qxe6 Bf6 Qf5 Qe7 Rg6 Bxc3 >bxc3 >00:02:23.1 2.82 12 10800628 Nf3 Ng8 Qh3 Be7 Qg3 Bf8 e5 d5 Qg6 Qe7 Nd4 Rec8 >00:03:45.5 2.96 12 17137762 Nde2 e5 Nd5 Re6 Ne3 Re8 Bf7 Be6 Bxe8 Qxe8 Nf5 Bxf5 >Rxf5 Rc8 >00:05:02.3 3.06 13 23201523 Nde2 e5 Nd5 Re6 Ne3 Re8 Bf7 Be6 Bg6 Qe7 Nf5 Bxf5 >Bxf5 Qf7 >00:07:29.7 3.04 14 34729514 Nde2 e5 Nd5 Re6 Ne3 Qe8 Nf5 Nh5 Bxe6 Bxe6 Rf2 g6 Nh4 >Bf7 Nxg6+ Bxg6 Qxg6 Qxg6 >00:28:37.1 3.38 14 139660132 Nf3 Nh5 Qg4 Nf6 Qg6 Re7 e5 Qe8 exf6 Qxg6 Rxg6 gxf6 >Rxf6 Bg7 Rg6 Bxc3 bxc3 >00:47:22.0 3.58 15 233016452 Nf3 Nh5 Qg4 Nf6 Qg6 Re7 e5 Be8 Qg2 Nh7 exd6 Qxd6 >Nh4 Qe5 Ng6+ Bxg6 Qxg6 It doesn't count unless you hold it. If you have time, please let it go for a few days and see what happens. bruce >On December 29, 2000 at 13:00:13, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>[D]r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Mine finds e5 in 66 hours on a quad Xeon, with a score that fails high and >>resolves after 93 hours to +5, in ply 17. >> >>It used to find this much more quickly (37 hours), but I think the difference is >>just random variation. The problem is complicated by the probability that Nce2 >>and Nf3 are both winning. >> >>Anyone else try this and find e5? >> >>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.