Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:20:23 12/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 30, 2000 at 01:53:18, Pete Galati wrote: >On December 29, 2000 at 13:00:13, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>[D]r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Mine finds e5 in 66 hours on a quad Xeon, with a score that fails high and >>resolves after 93 hours to +5, in ply 17. >> >>It used to find this much more quickly (37 hours), but I think the difference is >>just random variation. The problem is complicated by the probability that Nce2 >>and Nf3 are both winning. >> >>Anyone else try this and find e5? >> >>bruce > >We'll see how long I can do this. I've booted my 700mhz Celeron into >WindozeME's crappy version of Dos, and run there, the Dos Comet uses 62356k >hashtables (approx 60.89mb) which is pretty good considering that the computer >only has 64mb of memory. So I'm just going to let that run like that for a >while and see how long I can tolerate using my old computer. > >After 2 1/2 half hours, Comet has reached a sd of 13 and it says Nf3. I sure >hope I remembered to turn on the log!!! I don't have a clue if Comet can come >up with e5, but since it's one of my favorite programs, I'm going to give it a >chance. I guess that it can and the question is only if you are going to give it enough time(I have no idea if it needs days,weeks,monthes or years). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.