Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:10:11 12/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2000 at 09:27:25, Mike S. wrote: >On December 31, 2000 at 08:48:00, James wrote: > >>Have to agree. Possessing CM55, CM6K, CM7K, and CM8K, my ranking would be >><strongest first> 55, 6K, 8K, and 7K. Am still using CM5500 for internet play >>for "obvious" reasons. > >There were rgcc postings about CM8K being beaten by CM5K, even with the older >version on slower hardware. I couldn't quite believe this at first, but it seems >to get acknowledged. On the other hand, aren't previous versions the first ones >a new program is tested against, to see if it has improved? > >Is it possible nevertheless, that CM8K is still better than it's predecessors >against the other programs, or i.e. positionally stronger (so that matches >against older CM's are decided by pure tactics in favour for them)? I do not believe in it. I do not see why better positional knowledge is going to help against other programs and not against older versions of chessmaster. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.