Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:57:50 12/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
>I mean to HJS tournament and I can add that by the same logic tiger13 is better
>than gambittiger(11.5/18 is better than 8.5/16) when I know that your opinion
>was the opposite.
>
>Uri
when we said that hiarcs7.01 is stronger than 7.32, not many believed.
now it has come into the swedish list and you quote it.
funny. as long as it is not in the ssdf-list, people call you
subjective and "you cannot measure it by watching a few games, you need
at least xyz games to know".
now we know.
THE SSDF RATING LIST 2000-12-28 76240 games played by 211 computers
Rating + - Games Won Oppo
------ --- --- ----- --- ----
1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2629 25 -24 845 67% 2506
2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2589 23 -22 1027 65% 2483
3 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2572 28 -27 651 62% 2483
4 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2548 28 -27 658 60% 2475
5 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2547 25 -25 791 60% 2476
6 Hiarcs 7.01 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2541 42 -42 274 53% 2522
7 Gandalf 4.32f 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2530 29 -29 584 52% 2519
8 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2529 29 -28 597 59% 2466
yes i believe gambit-tiger is stronger.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.