Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:53:49 12/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2000 at 13:57:50, Thorsten Czub wrote: >when we said that hiarcs7.01 is stronger than 7.32, not many believed. >now it has come into the swedish list and you quote it. >funny. as long as it is not in the ssdf-list, people call you >subjective and "you cannot measure it by watching a few games, you need >at least xyz games to know". > >now we know. I believe that 7.32 has a bug at long time control. on p200MMX 7.32 had better rating than 7 Here is some information about these programs on p200MMX It was taken from http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/rlwww005.txt 18 Hiarcs 7.32 64MB P200 MMX 2473 24 -24 844 59% 2407 22 Hiarcs 7.0 64MB P200 MMX 2458 21 -21 1112 55% 2419 7.32 has some retaining hash tables bug. If 7.01 does not have the same bug it can explain the fact that 7.01's rating is better than 7.32's rating on fast hardware because my experience tells me that the bug cause problems only at long time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.