Author: William Bryant
Date: 12:17:37 12/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2000 at 00:59:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >But note that I do not count quiescence searching at all since move ordering >is a lot simpler there. And note that I only count this on nodes that fail high >on some move. If it fails high anywhere, in increment a counter. If it fails >high on the _first_ move searched, I increment another counter (I don't count >the null-move as a move here, for obvious reasons). > Thanks for this clarification. We may be comparing apples to oranges in how we count fail high nodes. Also, I very much may need to work on move ordering. William wbryant@ix.netcom.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.