Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:03:25 12/31/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 31, 2000 at 17:56:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On December 31, 2000 at 17:38:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On December 31, 2000 at 16:26:23, Andy Serpa wrote: >> >>>It seems most programs are getting better and better at avoiding blocked >>>positions. Does that mean that are getting worse and worse at analyzing blocked >>>positions that are presented to them? >>> >>>In other words, if I want to use a computer to help analyze my own human - human >>>games in which I might get into very closed positions on purpose, and where >>>trying my best to unblock it might not be the best thing to do, is a computer >>>any use to me here? Is it just going to come up with unblocking moves no matter >>>what, or is there any program that can do a decent analysis of such positions? >>>(Positions that the computer would never find itself in had it played the game) >>> >> >>>Andy Serpa >> >>Deep Fritz was programmed to play better at blocked positions and it is an >>improvement on the current SSDF leader Fritz 6a. Therefore, it will play better >>overall. > >PS: The Key word here is which program has better positional understanding to >analyze blocked positions? These three programs will be your best to analyze closed positions: Deep Fritz, Shredder5 and Rebel Century. >>Pichard. >>http://www.chessbase.com/newproducts.htm#deep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.