Author: CLiebert
Date: 04:53:49 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 06:59:48, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On January 02, 2001 at 03:38:36, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On January 02, 2001 at 03:32:29, Helmut Conrady wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 2001 at 03:22:46, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>From CSS magazine 6/00: Deep Fritz makes no sense to use with slow ~400 Mhz PC >>>>and single prosessor! >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>On which page have you read this? >>> >>>Helmut >> >>Sorry don't remember, but something like that was written in Deep Fritz article. >>Actually I was surprised, when article was so objective! >> >>Jouni > > >The closest reference in CSS 6/00 was on page 21 where Mathias Feist says the >following: "...Aus Performance-Gruenden ist mindestens ein Pentium II/Celeron >anzuraten". (At least PII or Celeron recommended) > >*** Djordje 1:6 is still possible, I have seen a lot of such rows from nearly equal programs. But Fritz/K6 against Junior/K6 on a 450mhz pc is indeed a little bit unlucky combination: Fritz6 dislike the Amd and is much faster on a P3. It it likes fast pc´s with bigger internal cache. With Junior it is just the opposite, it likes the k6 (despite Amir never used it). If you replay this match on intel-pcs you will get most problably very different results. I am shure that this result doesn´t reflect the real relation between these engines... But nevertheless, thats life. Christian
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.