Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Sort Order for Moves in Full-Width/Quiescence

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 15:02:40 01/28/98

Go up one level in this thread



On January 28, 1998 at 17:05:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>from my early testing, you have to weight based on distance from the
>root...  because I trust a move backed up as best near the root rather
>than one backed up as best near the tips.

Possible topics:

1) Whether or not it really matters how far the move is from the root,
since this is just being used to get a rough idea of what moves tend to
be good.  I'm not sure it's intuitive that closer to the root is better,
since most applications of this heuristic will occur further from the
root, why not weight moves that tend to cause cutoffs way out there as
higher?

2) Whether the moves that tend to have high history values in one
position also tend to have them in other positions, and if so, perhaps
some sort of static weighting system might be more efficient.

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.