Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:09:48 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 08:36:34, Christophe Theron wrote: >On January 02, 2001 at 03:58:52, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 02, 2001 at 03:22:46, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>From CSS magazine 6/00: Deep Fritz makes no sense to use with slow ~400 Mhz PC >>>and single prosessor! >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Does it mean that Deep Fritz earn more speed from the fast Pc's? >> >>I am interested to know because chessbase claimed that Deep Fritz is better than >>Fritz6 even on one processor. >> >>Do they mean that it is better only for faster computers? >> >>I am interested to know the number of nodes per second of Deep Fritz in the ssdf >>games and in faster computers like PIII800. >> >>Uri > > > >And what do you expect? A miracle? A space-time distortion? I understood that the claim was that Deep fritz has problem with slower computers and not that it has problem with slower time control. > >Program X is better on faster computers is the bullshit I read since years for >almost every program out there. It is something that it is possible to check only by comparing nodes per second without games. If Deep Fritz(p800) is 150% faster than DeepFritz (SSDF) when other programs like Fritz6a are only 100% faster than it means that Deep Fritz likes more the fast hardware. The sentence of Jouni was: "Deep Fritz makes no sense to use with slow ~400 Mhz PC and single prosessor!" It means that on 800 MHz Deep Fritz does not have problems and there is only one possible reason for it(the reason that I suggested) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.