Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Intelligence, Human Intelligence and Human and Animal Mind

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 18:02:23 01/28/98


Sprry for the long title, but it seems that at least part of the
discussion about this issue just happens becauise a confussion between
human mind with human intelligence andf human intelligence with
intelligence as such. Human mind is a complex design where many levels
of adaptative capacities, beginning with sensorial ones, are
interrelated in such a complex way -including emotions- that in fact
human intelligence cannot be understioood without them. Thee recent book
Descarte's error by Mr Antonio R. Damasio show convincingly that.
Nevwerthelles, wwhat cannot be separated in the human domain does not
means that cannot be separated in any other domain. Intelligence is just
a kind of behaviour we can define as a capacity to solve adaptative
problems, that is, in academic exopression, to solve problems. That's
all. Of course from the point of view of human experuience of
intelligence, any other form is a kind of imitation, something
artificial, specially if we have designed it. But intelligence is
intelligence, no matter if:
a) Operates separated or united to other functions
B) if operates in an organic neural network or a sintetic one
C) if it is of high or low level intelligence
D) if his fdomain is wide or narrow.
Also, on the ground of a value definition, we have the right to define
intelligence only to anything that is equal to human intelligence, but
that kind of reasonning does not go to anywhere, is not scientific as
much does not let room for further discussion.
I think chess  programs are Intelligent devices, artificial if you wish
to call that way, but in any sense intelligent, even if they are not
VERY intelligent beyond a very narrow scope. And why ther are son?
becasue they solve not only problems, but different problems. Inside the
chess domain, each posiition is a different problem. To think they are
not because they operates on the basis of rules is like to say we are
not intelligent because we operate on the ground of aristotelian  logic
rules, Descartes rules, scientific method rules and so on.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.