Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 12:20:38 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 11:15:02, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On January 02, 2001 at 10:57:32, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On January 02, 2001 at 07:53:49, CLiebert wrote: >> >>>On January 02, 2001 at 06:59:48, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >>> >>>>On January 02, 2001 at 03:38:36, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 02, 2001 at 03:32:29, Helmut Conrady wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 02, 2001 at 03:22:46, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>From CSS magazine 6/00: Deep Fritz makes no sense to use with slow ~400 Mhz PC >>>>>>>and single prosessor! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Jouni >>>>>> >>>>>>On which page have you read this? >>>>>> >>>>>>Helmut >>>>> >>>>>Sorry don't remember, but something like that was written in Deep Fritz article. >>>>>Actually I was surprised, when article was so objective! >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>> >>>>The closest reference in CSS 6/00 was on page 21 where Mathias Feist says the >>>>following: "...Aus Performance-Gruenden ist mindestens ein Pentium II/Celeron >>>>anzuraten". (At least PII or Celeron recommended) >>>> >>>>*** Djordje >>> >>> >>> >>>1:6 is still possible, I have seen a lot of such rows from nearly >>>equal programs. But Fritz/K6 against Junior/K6 on a 450mhz pc is indeed a little >>>bit unlucky combination: Fritz6 dislike the Amd and is much faster on a P3. It >>>it likes fast pc´s with bigger internal cache. >>>With Junior it is just the opposite, it likes the k6 (despite Amir never used >>>it). If you replay this match on intel-pcs you will get most problably very >>>different results. I am shure that this result doesn´t reflect the real relation >>>between these engines... >>> >>>But nevertheless, thats life. >>> >>>Christian >> >>Yes, I think not a good idea to start with Deep Fritz under an AMD processor ! >>I hope the SSDF will used in the future not "Neanderthal" processors ! >> >>Gandalf 4.32g or Crafty also not very good under an AMD processor. For Gandalf >>4.32g 10-20 ELO ! The new version is maybe 30 ELO better. I believe for Crafty a >>little bit more than 10-20 ELO ! >> >>I think interesting for the SSDF are Pentium III 800 MHz processors and >>dual-systems. But 10 dual system are very expensiv :-)) >> >>Best >>Frank > >Hi! > >I don't believe Fritz dislikes AMD K6-2 as is the case for Gandalf and Crafty >but it is true that Junior and Rebel really likes K6-2 vs Pentium2. > >No I hope we are going for Thunderbird 1200. Hopefully with the beginning soon. > >Bertil SSDF Hi Bertil, I know that Fritz is faster on a Pentium III processor ! Look for an example: Analyses with Pentium II 450 and AMD K6-2 450 MHz, or the Fritz bench test ! I think a Thunderbird 1.2 GHz is for the SSDF not very interesting. You can buy 10x Thunderbird 1.2 GHz or 10x Dual Pentium III 867 MHz. The different is ... The SSDF can play more games and can tested more programs. The price is the same ! See my Deep Fritz review about Dual System / SMP / processors ! Furthermore, the SSDF can tested Dual versions ! What do you say now ? A Thunderbird 1.2 GHz is better for testing ? I have here an other opinion. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.