Author: CLiebert
Date: 13:37:35 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 10:54:10, Randy Schmidt wrote: >On January 02, 2001 at 07:53:49, CLiebert wrote: > >>1:6 is still possible, I have seen a lot of such rows from nearly >>equal programs. But Fritz/K6 against Junior/K6 on a 450mhz pc is indeed a little >>bit unlucky combination: Fritz6 dislike the Amd and is much faster on a P3. It >>it likes fast pc´s with bigger internal cache. >>With Junior it is just the opposite, it likes the k6 (despite Amir never used >>it). If you replay this match on intel-pcs you will get most problably very >>different results. I am shure that this result doesn´t reflect the real relation >>between these engines... >> >>But nevertheless, thats life. >> >>Christian > >You did say this, but to emphasize the point, NEW Thunderbirds have the on board internal cache, so I am sure F6 will do just fine on those. Maybe Deep Fritz would nevertheless vote for PIII - some figures: - DF nps per mhz on P3: 841,58 Duron: 715,53 - Junior nps per mhz on P3: 866,8 Duron: 867,1 Source: Chess-CPU-REPORT 2001 (CSS 1-01, test with thunderbird/other engs 1000 will follow)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.