Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 14:23:10 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 17:14:32, John Dahlem wrote: >On January 02, 2001 at 16:57:54, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On January 02, 2001 at 16:41:00, John Dahlem wrote: >> >>>I keep reading that this is an inferior program because it is DOS. But it runs >>>in windows, so what is the problem? Is it slower in Windows? >>> >> >> >>Just a few things off the top: >> >>1. Doesn't use long filenames. >>2. Doesn't share clipboard (copy, paste) >>3. Doesn't use standard techniques for moving/resizing windows and other GUI >>techniques. >> >>Feel free to add more. > > >But the actual playing strength then is not affected, only the ease of use, >right? If you take the time to learn it, the interface is pretty good! The looks of C3 are not up to the MS Windows standards, but it has loads of possibilities. You can pretty much configure the interface the way you like it. And in fact its one of the chessprograms I like most to play with. Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.