Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 15:18:59 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 01, 2001 at 14:33:30, Lex Loep wrote: >On January 01, 2001 at 10:47:44, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >>On January 01, 2001 at 10:18:05, Lex Loep wrote: -- snip -- >>If I understand this right, wouldn't it be better to send the remaining time >>(time and otim in the winboard protocol) to the programs? >> > >That would be better but I wanted to keep the interface to the engines as >simple >as possible. The native engines and most winboard engines support this, but >then >what would happen if you use auto232, then there are no such command. That's a problem that auto232 already has. It's cleanly solvable for WB why not take that and just ignore this for auto232? I have a feeling that auto232 will not survive very long anyway. >>For the moment I will take a break in further development, still I think it has >>turned into a usefull tool. >> >>I would like to get some feedback on the following: >> >>- What features would you like to see ? >>- Are there essential things missing ? >>- Would you like to see auto232 support added ? > > Maybe some of the wb-232 translators will do? > >> > >Could be. Can somebody test this ? I tried to add winboard232b.exe as an engine but during the Add process it made my system (win2000) to crash completely. I had to reboot each time. I couldn't figure out what was happening. Something is done when the program is loaded. That's for sure! There are other wb-aut232 programs but I don't know where they are. //Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.