Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:55:49 01/02/01

Go up one level in this thread

On January 02, 2001 at 19:47:48, Pierre Bourget wrote:

>Hi Dann, could you give us the source (book or magazine)of the problem.

I think the mystery is solved.  It wasn't FIDE chess, but (rather) a chess
variant called Chancellor Chess:
http://www.chessvariants.com/usualeq.dir/chancellor2.html

• Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? Pierre Bourget 19:45:34 01/02/01
  • Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? leonid 10:25:59 01/03/01
    • Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? Heiner Marxen 14:41:46 01/04/01
      • Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? leonid 16:37:02 01/04/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.