Author: John Merlino
Date: 17:01:30 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 19:37:15, Dann Corbit wrote: >[D]8/8/8/8/7K/1p6/7Q/1k6 w - - acn 12240607; acs 147; bm Kg3 Kg4; ce 32746; dm >11; pv Kg4 b2 Kf3 Ka1 Qe5 Kb1 Qc5 Ka2 Qd5+ Ka3 Qb5 b1=Q Qxb1 Ka4 Ke4 Ka5 Kd5 Ka6 >Kc6 Ka7 Qb7#; c0 "Chancellor Chess - a mate in 5 study by David Paulowich"; It's DEFINITELY NOT a mate in 5. This can easily be seen by looking at the position. I'm guessing that Chest is correct. It's a lot easier to believe there was a typo than Chest being wrong about this one. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.