Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19?

Author: Pierre Bourget

Date: 19:45:34 01/02/01

Go up one level in this thread

On January 02, 2001 at 19:55:49, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 02, 2001 at 19:47:48, Pierre Bourget wrote:
>
>>Hi Dann, could you give us the source (book or magazine)of the problem.
>
>I think the mystery is solved.  It wasn't FIDE chess, but (rather) a chess
>variant called Chancellor Chess:
>http://www.chessvariants.com/usualeq.dir/chancellor2.html

Here is a true mate in 5 with the same materiel by the great Sam Loyd ,Chess
Monthly 1857.
Very easy for any computer but beautiful in his simplicity.

Pierre

[D]8/8/8/8/8/Q7/4p3/5k1K w - - 0 1

• Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? leonid 10:25:59 01/03/01
  • Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? Heiner Marxen 14:41:46 01/04/01
    • Re: Mate study -- who's wrong: David Paulowich or Chest 3.19? leonid 16:37:02 01/04/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.