Author: Lex Loep
Date: 23:17:43 01/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 02, 2001 at 18:18:59, Peter Fendrich wrote: >On January 01, 2001 at 14:33:30, Lex Loep wrote: > >>On January 01, 2001 at 10:47:44, Peter Fendrich wrote: >> >>>On January 01, 2001 at 10:18:05, Lex Loep wrote: > >-- snip -- >>>If I understand this right, wouldn't it be better to send the remaining time >>>(time and otim in the winboard protocol) to the programs? >>> >> >>That would be better but I wanted to keep the interface to the engines as >simple >>as possible. The native engines and most winboard engines support this, but >then >>what would happen if you use auto232, then there are no such command. > That's a problem that auto232 already has. > It's cleanly solvable for WB why not take that and just ignore this for > auto232? I have a feeling that auto232 will not survive very long anyway. > I will see. >>>For the moment I will take a break in further development, still I think it has >>>turned into a usefull tool. >>> >>>I would like to get some feedback on the following: >>> >>>- What features would you like to see ? >>>- Are there essential things missing ? >>>- Would you like to see auto232 support added ? >> >> Maybe some of the wb-232 translators will do? >> >>> >> >>Could be. Can somebody test this ? > >I tried to add winboard232b.exe as an engine but during the Add process it >made my system (win2000) to crash completely. I had to reboot each time. >I couldn't figure out what was happening. Something is done when the program is >loaded. That's for sure! >There are other wb-aut232 programs but I don't know where they are. >//Peter I saw there where some incompatabilities between w2k and winboard232b.exe. Thanks for trying. Lex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.