Author: Mark Schreiber
Date: 12:05:18 01/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
Ed Schroder said on December 6 that Rebel would run on an Intel Pentium 3 with a speed of 866 Mhz. 4 days later he added that he is trying to get a faster machine. How much faster is a P4 1500 mhz than a P3 866 Mhz? How many more rating points would it give Rebel? Mark On January 01, 2001 at 23:59:24, Dan Ellwein wrote: >On January 01, 2001 at 15:02:02, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On January 01, 2001 at 09:13:29, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On January 01, 2001 at 04:32:37, James Robertson wrote: >>> >>>>On December 31, 2000 at 19:42:24, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 31, 2000 at 19:39:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 31, 2000 at 19:35:25, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On December 31, 2000 at 19:31:19, James T. Walker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>There is no Information on what type of hardware Rebel will be playing with. >>>>>>But I believe that an AMD 1.2 GHz will be sufficient for an IM. >>>>> >>>>>It's a GM. >>>>> >>>>>Mogens. >>>> >>>>Does anybody know what this vdWiel dude's rating is? >>> >>>Last rating list I have (pretty old) John is rated 2544. >>> >>> >>>>BTW, I think this match will be more interesting than every GM challenge game >>>>put together. >>> >>>It surely is the moment of truth for Rebel to survive the anti-computer >>>strategies of v/d Wiel. >>> >>>I would have preferred Karpov, Timman, Yussupov and a lot of others above >>>John v/d Wiel as I think he is much more dangerous than his rating implies. >>> >>>I went through the game Rebel8 played against v/d Wiel as listed on the >>>live-web-site and checked the errors of Rebel8. Fortunately the Rebel of >>>4 years later does not play them. So since today I am more positive and >>>I hope Rebel will be the moment of truth for v/d Wiel too losing its first >>>game(s) against a computer! >>> >>>[D]6k1/1pp3pp/p4b2/2P5/2b2p2/2P5/P5PP/1K1RN3 b - - id Van der Wiel, J. - Comp >>>Rebel 8.0; am Bxc3; >>> >>>This is the main blunder of Rebel8, too greedy. The current Rebel does not >>>even consider 29..Bxc3? from the very start. I guess the better evalution of >>>the bishop pair is responsible for that. >>> >>>How do other peograms do? >> >>Analysis by Fritz 6a on 400 MHz P2: >> >>1...Bxa2+ 2.Kxa2 Bxc3 >> ± (0.72) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >> +- (1.78) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >>1...f3 2.Nxf3 Bxc3 >> ± (1.37) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >> ² (0.47) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >>1...Bxc3 2.Rc1 Bxe1 >> = (-0.13) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >>1...Kf8 >> ³ (-0.38) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >>1...g5 2.c6 bxc6 3.Nf3 >> ³ (-0.41) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >> ³ (-0.28) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 1kN >>1...Kf8! >> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 2kN >>1...Bxc3 2.Rc1 Bxe1 3.Rxe1 Kf7 4.a3 >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 4/13 00:00:00 2kN >> ³ (-0.31) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 6kN >>1...g5! >> ³ (-0.34) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 6kN >>1...Bb5 2.Kb2 g5 3.Nc2 Bc6 4.Rd2 Kf8 5.Nb4 Bb5 6.Nd5 >> ³ (-0.38) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 11kN >> = (-0.09) Depth: 14/30 00:01:06 20040kN > > >Analysis by Chessmaster 8000 on 400 MHz Celeron: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves > >3:12 11 0.03 9,644,067 Bb5 Kb2 Bc6 Rd2 Kf7 Nc2 Be4 Nd4 Bd5 Re2 Kg6
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.