Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 03:09:06 01/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 03, 2001 at 14:13:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 03, 2001 at 13:03:43, Howard Exner wrote: > >>On January 03, 2001 at 12:42:11, Paul Doire wrote: >> >>>Van der Wiel missed some opportunities, but Rebel defended well. >> >>I wonder if the missed opportunities of Van der Wiel will adversely >>effect his play in the next round? Sometimes it is not easy to shake off the >>disappointment one feels when missing a win. Being a strong professional Gm he >>probably will come out swinging. Here of course computers have an edge in the >>energy level they bring to each game. Their programmers probably make up for the >>machine's non existent feelings. How is Ed's health holding up after this one? >>Maybe paramedics should be on standby? :) >> >>Another thought on the match so far, if the two games were reversed, in that >>Rebel missed winning chances, would we be as forgiving? In other words are our >>expectations of computers too high? > >I was disappointed from van der Wiel. > >I expected a GM to be better in tactics. >It leads to the question if programs can teach humans to be better in tactics by >giving them the right exercises to solve. > >Uri At a certain age no lessons help anymore however. Tactics you need to learn at age = 11 to 19
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.