Author: James T. Walker
Date: 11:48:39 01/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2001 at 11:54:02, Rajen Gupta wrote: >Hi james: i would call that a pretty lousy result for cm 8000 as my cm 5000 used >to regulrly thrash hiarcs 7.32 without much of a problem.as i recall hircs >always was a sucker for chessmaster. > >rajen > >On January 04, 2001 at 01:30:47, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Final score: Hiarcs 7.32 wins 13.5-8.5. Hiarcs 7.32 won the first 4 games and >>after that it was a pretty even fight. Not bad for CM8K with a lousy book and >>no learning and no tablebases. Games were on two Athlon 900 Mhz/256M machines. >>Hiarcs 7.32 has 4.3 Gigs of tablebases available. PGN available to anyone who >>wants it. >>Jim Well don't forget it is a short match and things could turn around if it continued. I did not test CM5K very much so I can't really comment on the two. Maybe it's time to play the two against each other. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.