Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rebel Shortcoming (Mainly to Ed)

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 17:49:32 01/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 04, 2001 at 15:05:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 04, 2001 at 14:15:55, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On January 04, 2001 at 13:39:36, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Ed:
>>>It seems to me that the problem with Rebel Century 3 is in the middle game. Too
>>>much mistakes. Capture of poisoned pawns by example. Maybe something more of his
>>>faster speed should be used for sheer search? The consolation about the human
>>>ability to handle computer programs is not enough. Not anymore. I see a fall
>>>from Rebel 10 strenght in the field of anti human games.
>>
>>How do you see this fall?
>>
>>Did you analyze some positions when Century3 blundered with Rebel10?
>>Did you find that Rebel10 could play better?
>>
>>Uri
>
>He's just victim of commercial propaganda from other companies who
>have the money to pay 2700 rated persons to play against their progs.


As always, Vincent, you just spit words without thinking before. If there is a
guy that has payed people to play his program, well, is Ed Schroeder. That's OK,
of course. So If I have been a victim of something, he should be the
executioner. But In fact I am only victim of you, all the time promising me that
finally you will send me a workable version of Diep for my money. Oh, that's is
an old history by now, do not worry...
Fernando.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.