Author: Sylvain Renard
Date: 05:30:10 01/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2001 at 02:03:50, Uri Blass wrote:
>On January 04, 2001 at 22:26:49, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>
>>On January 04, 2001 at 18:36:15, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>
>>>21.Nf3 Bc6 22.Nh4 g5 23.Ng6+ Kh7 24.Nxf8+ Rxf8 25.Bxe6 Bd7
>>> ± (1.06) Depth: 19/47 19:04:48 42992526kN
>>>21.e5
>>> ± (1.09) Depth: 19/47 21:54:31 49601048kN
>>>21.e5 dxe5 22.Ne4 Nh5 23.Qg4 Nf4 24.Nf3 Qc7 25.Nh4 Bc6
>>> ± (1.31) Depth: 19/50 26:22:52 60316211kN
>>>
>>>(Lee, Pensacola,Fl 04.01.2001)
>>>System 800Mhz Athlon 256Mb pc-133 128MBHT
>>>
>I think that the line is not correct and I guess that 23.Qg6 is the right move.
>It is interesting to know how much time do programs need to find 23.Qg6 and how
>much time do they need to see a winning score for this move(I assume that 22.Ne4
>Uri
Hello,
in the french review GAMBISCO, n°48 july 1994, Pierre Nolot wrote
that this test will be the first to be found, some years later.
He was right!
Spassky played 23.Qg6, but Pierre thought that 23.Qg4!! (Nolot's comment)
was better!
Best regards,
Sylvain
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.