Author: Howard Exner
Date: 12:49:29 01/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2001 at 20:44:02, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Easy: I compare MY games against Rebel 10 and MY games against Century 3. As I >am the same all the time, then variations of playing strenght and results can >only be atributed to the program. I felt more dangerous R10 than Century. >Results validate that impression. >Fernando As an experiment try the following. Set RC3's knowledge to 500. It has the effect of extending moves deeper, with the speed in search depth trade-off. I'm not saying this is a better setting but it may come closer in style to previous Rebels - Century 1 and Rebel 10. These versions did not reach the ply depth of RC3. My personal favorite, for no particular reason other than being a bit more tactically astute (but not always) is this personality: [Pawn Value = 100] [Knight Value = 100] [Bishop Value = 100] [Rook Value = 100] [Queen Value = 100] [King Safety = 100] [Mobility = 100] [Pawn Structure = 100] [Passed Pawns = 100] [Pins = 100] [Bishop Pair = 100] [Chess Knowledge = 150] [Attractiveness = 112] [Attacking = 108] [Strength of Play = 100] [Draw Contempt Factor = 0.00] [Selective Search = 100] [Search Technique = NORMAL] Really not too far afield from the default which is why I like it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.