Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 14:02:34 01/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 05, 2001 at 02:13:41, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 04, 2001 at 20:44:02, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Easy: I compare MY games against Rebel 10 and MY games against Century 3. As I >>am the same all the time, then variations of playing strenght and results can >>only be atributed to the program. > >The question is if you are the same all the time. >If the games against Rebel Century are later games then it is possible that you >learned to play better against Rebel. > >A better test is to play one game against Rebel10 and after it one game against >Century3 and to continue playing in this way in order to see if you get better >results against Century. > >Uri Yours is an almost philosphical question. Am I the same? Well, I would like to believe I have made some progress in the time, lastly. Of course all this issue is much subjetive because my feeling of danger and results change also with clearly inferior programs that, nevertheles, have something into them that produces problems tor my specific way of playing. The case is very clear to me with CSTAL II, that withoud doubt is not that strong as century, but crertes lot more difficulties to me to overcome. Maybe is a matter of style more than of strenght. Cheers Fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.