Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 14:27:15 01/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
>>>>>21.Nf3 Bc6 22.Nh4 g5 23.Ng6+ Kh7 24.Nxf8+ Rxf8 25.Bxe6 Bd7 >>>>> ± (1.06) Depth: 19/47 19:04:48 42992526kN >>>>>21.e5 >>>>> ± (1.09) Depth: 19/47 21:54:31 49601048kN >>>>>21.e5 dxe5 22.Ne4 Nh5 23.Qg4 Nf4 24.Nf3 Qc7 25.Nh4 Bc6 >>>>> ± (1.31) Depth: 19/50 26:22:52 60316211kN >>>>> >>>>>(Lee, Pensacola,Fl 04.01.2001) >>>>>System 800Mhz Athlon 256Mb pc-133 128MBHT >>>>> >>>I think that the line is not correct and I guess that 23.Qg6 is the right move. >>>It is interesting to know how much time do programs need to find 23.Qg6 and how >>>much time do they need to see a winning score for this move(I assume that 22.Ne4 >>>Uri >> >> Hello, ><snipped> >>Spassky played 23.Qg6, but Pierre thought that 23.Qg4!! (Nolot's comment) >>was better! > Qg6 is better and i had already mention analizing in reverse ...at 23Qg6 is prefered over Qg4 at 16Ply so if i wanted to leave my computer running for 52 more hours it would've surely found Qg6 in the pv.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.