Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:21:54 01/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 2001 at 02:57:18, Ed Schröder wrote: >On January 06, 2001 at 01:51:23, Uri Blass wrote: > >>[D]rn6/2Qn1qk1/2p2pp1/1p1pp3/1P1P2N1/7P/N1P2PP1/R5K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>If you believe the analysis in the Rebel site Rebel blundered by Qb7 when Qd6 >>was better. >> >>I am interested to know what is the opinion of program after long search. >> >>Uri > >I ran Century 2.01 running under Rebel-Tiger II. It does change to Qd6 >in about 12 minutes. I will try Century 3.0 later. > >Ed > >------------------------------------- > >Loading... > >Engine version : Rebel Century 2.01 >Hash table size : 40 Mb > >rn6/2Qn1qk1/2p2pp1/1p1pp3/1P1P2N1/7P/N1P2PP1/R5K1 w - - > >00:01 04.00 0.21 1.dxe5 Nxe5 2.Qd8 Nxg4 3.hxg4 >00:01 05.00 0.84 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Nxe5 Nxe5 4.Qxb8 >00:01 06.00 0.77 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Qc8 Kh7 4.Nxe5 Nxe5 >00:02 07.00 0.83 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Nxe5 Nxe5 4.Qxb8 Nc4 5.Qd8 >00:03 08.00 0.75 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Nxe5 Nxe5 4.Qxb8 Nc4 5.Qc8 Qf5 >00:04 09.00 0.65 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Nxe5 Nxe5 4.Qxb8 Nc4 5.Qd8 Kh7 6.c3 >00:06 10.00 0.21 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.c3 exd4 3.cxd4 f5 4.Ne5 Nxe5 5.Qxb8 Nd3 6.Qd8 >00:12 10.02 0.23 1.c3 exd4 2.cxd4 f5 3.Ne5 Nxe5 4.Qxe5+ Qf6 5.Qc7+ Kh6 6.Qf4+ >Kh7 7.f3 Nd7 >00:19 11.00 0.22 1.c3 exd4 2.cxd4 f5 3.Ne5 Nxe5 4.Qxe5+ Kg8 5.Qd6 Qg7 6.g3 >Kh7 7.Qe5 >00:20 11.01 0.29 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 f5 3.Nf6 Nxe5 4.Ne8+ Kf8 5.Qxb8 Qxe8 6.Qc7 >00:31 12.00 0.40 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 f5 3.Nf6 Nxe5 4.Ne8+ Kf8 5.Nc7 Ned7 6.Qc8+ >Kg7 7.Qd8 >00:53 13.00 0.25 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 f5 3.Nf6 Nxe5 4.Ne8+ Kf8 5.Nc7 Ned7 6.Qc8+ >Kg7 7.Qd8 Kh7 >02:01 14.00 0.30 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Nxe5 Qf6 4.Re1 Rxa2 5.Nxd7 Nxd7 >6.Qxd7+ Kh6 >05:41 15.00 0.09 1.Qb7 Ra3 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Nxe5 Nxe5 4.Qxb8 Qf6 5.c3 >11:46 15.04 0.11 1.Qd6 Qf8 2.dxe5 Qxd6 3.exd6 Nb6 4.Re1 Rxa2 5.Re7+ Kf8 >6.Nxf6 >21:57 16.00 0.04 1.Qd6 Qf8 2.dxe5 fxe5 3.Qc7 Qf5 4.Qd8 Qe6 Century3 cannot avoid Qb7 at depth 15(100Mbytes hash pIII450). It can see the score 0.09 for Qb7 but cannot find a better move. The score of Century3 dropped at depth 16 and is -0.10 after 1:18:56 so I guess that is going to find a better move. It considers 1.c3 in the last 20 minutes and I guess that it can find this move at depth 16 unless I stop the analysis (1.c3 was considered to be the best move after a long search of Junior5.9) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.