Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:14:02 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2001 at 06:26:48, Mark Schreiber wrote: >On January 05, 2001 at 09:56:08, Dan Andersson wrote: > >>It bears repeating that one cannot compare the clockrates of P4 an PIII, the >>performance of Rebel searchwise on a P4 1.5 GHz may or may not be better than a >>PIII 866. But the SpecInt score for Crafty is abysmal compared to a 1.2 GHz >>T-Bird. >> >>Regards Dan Andersson > >I was not comparing clockrates. I only said that Rebel in its entirety would >probably run faster on a P4 1.5 GHz than on P3 866 MHz. The P3 866 MHz is not >the fastest commercially available PC today. It would be an easy way to improve >Rebel’s performance. I think maybe the sponsor and not Ed Schröder may decide >what computer to use. >Mark I am not sure if P4 1.5 GHz is faster or slower. I undertood from previous posts that PIV is a downgrade relative to PIII with the same number of Mhz's(at least for chess programs) I guess that is better to use the fastest PIII for the match and 866 is not the fastest pentiumIII Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.