Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 05:23:57 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2001 at 07:14:02, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 07, 2001 at 06:26:48, Mark Schreiber wrote: > >>On January 05, 2001 at 09:56:08, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>>It bears repeating that one cannot compare the clockrates of P4 an PIII, the >>>performance of Rebel searchwise on a P4 1.5 GHz may or may not be better than a >>>PIII 866. But the SpecInt score for Crafty is abysmal compared to a 1.2 GHz >>>T-Bird. >>> >>>Regards Dan Andersson >> >>I was not comparing clockrates. I only said that Rebel in its entirety would >>probably run faster on a P4 1.5 GHz than on P3 866 MHz. The P3 866 MHz is not >>the fastest commercially available PC today. It would be an easy way to improve >>Rebel’s performance. I think maybe the sponsor and not Ed Schröder may decide >>what computer to use. >>Mark > >I am not sure if P4 1.5 GHz is faster or slower. >I undertood from previous posts that PIV is a downgrade relative to PIII with >the same number of Mhz's(at least for chess programs) > >I guess that is better to use the fastest PIII for the match and 866 is not the >fastest pentiumIII > >Uri It was probably the fastes machine the sponsor could provide, and fast enough for Ed not to carry his own hardware to the event. I doubt an ie. Athlon 1.2GHz 256MB would make that much difference either. Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.