Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:30:22 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2001 at 12:05:11, Joshua Lee wrote: >Qg6 is better and i had already mention analizing in reverse ...at 23Qg6 is >prefered over Qg4 at 16Ply so if i wanted to leave my computer running for 52 >more hours it would've surely found Qg6 in the pv. I believe that Qg6 is better but the fact that Fritz could find Qg6 after more time is not a proof because it is possible that the reason that Qg4 is better is too deep for it to see at 16 plies. I am interested to know the move when it can see +5 score(Ferret's score of e5 after a long time was +5 but I am not sure if the reason was Qg6,Qg4 or another move that was not considered by us) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.