Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:11:34 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On January 07, 2001 at 15:05:37, David Rasmussen wrote: >On January 07, 2001 at 14:41:29, James Robertson wrote: > >>On January 07, 2001 at 09:26:38, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>On January 07, 2001 at 09:05:16, Severi Salminen wrote: >>> >>>>On January 07, 2001 at 07:08:46, dario wrote: >>>> >>>>>[Event "WMCCC 2000"] >>>>>[Site "London"] >>>>>[Date "2000.08.21"] >>>>>[Round "1"] >>>>>[White "Crafty"] >>>>>[Black "XiniX"] >>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>[ECO "B00"] >>>>>[PlyCount "22"] >>>> >>>>>1. e4 a6 2. d4 h6 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 g5 5. Be2 Bg7 6. O-O e6 7. Be3 Ne7 8. Qd2 f5 >>>>>9. exf5 Nxf5 10. Ne1 Nc6 11. Bh5+ O-O 1-0 >>>> >>>>Well, how would _your_ engine have played? >>>> >>>>Severi >>> >>>I think the point is that black castles out of check, which is illegal... >> >>I think Severi's point is that one shouldn't lol at a program's mistakes without >>first trying to write one and see the problems involved himself.... >> >>James > >I know, but while it is hard to write a program that doesnt get trashed by >crafty, it is not very hard to write a program that knows the rules of >castling... It is not important because the result is the same(Crafty wins) Xinix did better later(In this tournament it lost all the games except winning one game but in the next tournament it did better). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.