Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why? WHY?!

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 12:22:53 01/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On January 07, 2001 at 11:21:27, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On January 06, 2001 at 21:36:45, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On January 06, 2001 at 20:48:08, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On January 05, 2001 at 14:41:51, David Rasmussen wrote:
>>>
>>>>I was wondering why some of the clever ideas I've been reading about, aren't
>>>>used in the programs I know of.
>>>>
>>>>ETC, Enhanced Transposition Cutoff, seems like a very good idea and have been
>>>>tested to perform well in practice. Why isn't it used?
>>>>
>>>>I can't think of any more ideas right now...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>A number of ideas that sound simple and powerful actually do not work at all in
>>>computer chess.
>>>
>>>On the other hand, I know several strange and unsound ideas that are working
>>>great in my program... I was lucky enough to try them, but if I had trusted my
>>>feelings (and my logical sense) I would not have discovered them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>You said you didn't try most of your ideas yet. Why did you choose these?
>
>
>
>Because when I am tweaking a specific area of my program I don't stop until I
>have tried all I could try in this area.
>
>This leads to trying some stupid ideas in the area I'm working on before some
>other obvious ideas in another area.
>
>
>
>
>>And, I'm happy to hear that actual programers have all the best ideas too, and
>>not only people like what I used to be, but with no actual computer knowledge
>>(only imagined speculations) or ways of testing things.
>
>
>
>Sometimes the ideas that actually work look very strange because we assume that
>we understand the essence of the Chess game, but we actually don't understand it
>fully.
>
>Analyzing these strange ideas and why they work can lead to a better
>understanding of the game.
>
>That's one of the very interesting parts of chess programming.
>
>
>
>    Christophe

Sounds great! honestly!
Pack in as much as possible (of what works)!
I take it that it is only practical to make one internet upgrade patch per
comercial upgrade. Is this true?
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.