Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 13:40:11 01/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
>>>>>[Event "WMCCC 2000"] >>>>>[Site "London"] >>>>>[Date "2000.08.21"] >>>>>[Round "1"] >>>>>[White "Crafty"] >>>>>[Black "XiniX"] >>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>[ECO "B00"] >>>>>[PlyCount "22"] >>>> >>>>>1. e4 a6 2. d4 h6 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nc3 g5 5. Be2 Bg7 6. O-O e6 7. Be3 Ne7 8. Qd2 f5 >>>>>9. exf5 Nxf5 10. Ne1 Nc6 11. Bh5+ O-O 1-0 >>>> >>>>Well, how would _your_ engine have played? >>>> >>>>Severi >>> >>>I think the point is that black castles out of check, which is illegal... >> >>I think Severi's point is that one shouldn't lol at a program's mistakes without >>first trying to write one and see the problems involved himself.... >> >>James > >I know, but while it is hard to write a program that doesnt get trashed by >crafty, it is not very hard to write a program that knows the rules of >castling... Well, as others said castling and ep are the hardest ones in move gen (not impossible of course). But my point really was (which I didn't state very clearly, though) that Dario's message had nothing but "lol" as subject line and the pgn as message. Not too funny in my opinion... But if you consider that Anand would have played Qxe8# from initial position in KO championships... Yep, that's funny! Severi "funny guy" Salminen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.